There have been many debates over the years about the differences of Limited Service agents compared to Full Service agents. Many Limited Fee agents like to consider themselves Full Service, but potato, tomato (I don't know how to type the different pronounciation)
There is an article that I have included in my listing presentations since it came out last January. It's called In Search of a Better Deal: Effects of Limited Representation and Agent Experience. This is a great article and I thought I would quote some fabulous statistics it found. The main reason I present this report to my sellers is because it actually took place in the Dallas/Ft. Worth market. The study tracked over 55,000 residential transactions. The overall average of the study showed the listings to be on the market 90 days with an average sales price of $175,270.
"Limited service listings sold 1.7 percent less than typical exclusive-right-to-sell listings and took 17.1 percent longer to sell". With these numbers, "there does not appear to be any net gain to sellers using limited service representation."
Let's put that into real numbers. Let's say there is a house that sells for $200,000 in 60 days with a full service REALTOR®, like me. The above statistics would show this same house, with a limited service brokerage, would sell for $196,600 in 70.26 days. So, the seller "tried" to save 2% on the listing commission... did he succeed?? NO!
The difference in price is $3400. 2% of $196,600 is $3932. Then you need to calculate those extra 10.26 days on the market. What are your taxes per day? Let's say taxes are about $5600 a year which would be about $15.56 a day. Home Owner's Insurance can be estimated at about $5 per day ($1800 yearly coverage). Taxes and Insurance for the additional 17.1% marketing time is $210.95.
So, in all actuality, you didn't save 2% of the commission with a limited service brokerage. What you saved was $321.05. Is it really worth $321 to schedule all your own appointments; to be home for each and every showing to let them in the house; to sit on the market an extra 10 days; to call for feedback; or to negotiate your own contract instead of having the help of a professional? What is your time worth to you?
Other interesting findings were, "Sellers using listing agents with less than two years of experience received 1.1 percent less for a house compared with sellers who used agents with two to five years of experience, and the marketing time was 1.9 percent longer." "If the listing agent had more than fives years of experience [that's me as I'm in my seventh year], the seller received 0.8 percent more than sellers who used agents with two to five years of experience, and the property sold 1.5 percent faster."
As I mentioned, this is a great article and I include it in all my presentations, the seller's smile and nod, and they still ask for a discount... WHAT??
*Tierra Grande by James Ford and Ron Rutherford; January 2006


Bravo!!! :clapping:
I read your post in the forums about how you lost an AR lead to a discounter. Back in Feb I lost 2 listings total $1 million from an investor to a discounter. The listings expired, the market inventory exploded during that time and now that investor is stuck even if he is willing to pay someone full price.
He found me in a RE magazine and begged and plead for me to take it at a discount. He said if I worked for a 100% office that I would "be able" to discount. That really offended me because he doesn't understand or even know what kind of "split" I am on.
The moral of the story is: It's a Karma Thang when they don't want to listen to you because you get what you pay for!!
Sellers get a discount (minimal) for one thing, buying their new home with me as well. If they are not buying at the same time, full listing on the sale, and a credit for that minimal discount back when they buy.
I also offer to purchase the home warranty up to $400 for the buyers if the they give me 7 names and valid email addresses prior to closing. Many take me up on that, but you would be surprised how many bogus email addresses I've been given!
Other than that, NO DISCOUNT!! I'm a full service, full listing REALTOR® who is trying to run a business and I cannot run a business if I don't make any money!!
Excellent post, Donna. It ain't called limited service for nothing.
I have been writing a series on ActiveRain directed at FSBOs and probably need to throw in some calculations too. They think they are saving the commission, but on average FSBOs sell for 10% or less than a REALTOR-listed home, so they are really not making out financially, even with a hefty commission.
Jeff, I thought NAR acually published that the difference is 16% less for FSBO. I haven't looked recently, but I think the numbers are something like a national average of $227k for a regular listing and $196k for a FSBO. Definitely double check that before pounding it into a FSBO head, but I'm fairly certain the number is about 16%. That 16% probably doesn't even take into consideration the longer days on the market for not being listed in a local MLS.
Some people just flat out don't get it!
How about this - po-tay-to versus po-taw-toe and to-may-to versus to-maw-to ?
Good post, Donna!
Ann Cummings
Well - you can't blame you for being prepared.....or them for trying:-) You are doing the right thing though, by putting it into perspective.
Deb
When you act in this most professional & educational manner to inform your prospect and they still ask for a discount? That is what decides for you not to do business with them! Been there, done that,
Great Tool, Donna...keep it going.
Donna- Great Blog !! Very informative !!
Great post Donna - and the article you refernece is excellent as well. I think I will put a few in my presentation book! :)
Read it here
Donna, You might want to read this post: What would YOUR sign read?
Good post! Congratulations on the well deserved gold star!!
www.HomeRome.com
Baltimore,Md
Donna- Thank you for touching on this subject. An agent deserves to get paid well. I believe discounts lead to discounted service.
I am very good at what I do.
I charge more.
I will make you money.
The article link was posted in one of the comments above, but I went ahead and modified the blog to put the link in it as well.
By the way, the article also says that "properties listed by Brokers sold for 0.8 percent LESS than those listed by Salespersons, and with a slightly longer marketing time"...
Just another reason not to spend the 900 hours to get my broker's license!! I'm fine as a salesperson!!
Love this. I'm going to be using this one -- minus Sellers using listing agents with less than two years of experience received 1.1 percent less for a house compared with sellers who used agents with two to five years of experience, and the marketing time was 1.9 percent longer. -- of course. Since I've only been in the business about 6 months. :-)
Great post! Which do you think has a greater impact Limited versus Full representation or experience of the agent that effects sale price versus list price? An experienced full service agent will most likely get the seller to price their house closer to market price. Whereas a less experienced agent (full or limit service) will take a listing at a higher price, so it sets on the market longer. My only other comment on limited and full representation listings. The study can't factor in some of the other reasons for a seller may select a limited rep listing over full rep: 1. They have little or no equity built up to pay for a full service listing and the lack of agent experience to try to possibly negotiate a short sale. 2. The owner knows it all and thinks their home is worth more. 3. They could be cheap.
Keith, when I'm at the appt, they always smile and nod and tell me how much it makes sense. I don't get to defend not taking a discount because since I've started presenting this report, they haven't asked... BUT, when I call to follow up about getting the house on the market, they tell me they chose someone willing to list higher and take a reduction. Or, I'll see it listed in the MLS at a higher price and with a known discount company.
The couple of times I had been asked about a discount without presenting the report, no, I don't cave in. I ask them what part of my marketing and advertising they didn't like and which things they would like omitted because when I do a listing, I fully market and advertise. The sellers that actually have asked for a discount and allowed me to explain, are listings that I typically DO get. Very odd.
Suzanne and Chris, right on the money!!
Donna,
These limited offices are popping up like gangbusters here in the midwest. Your comments will help me deal with this issue more informatively.
Hey Donna!
Remember me? This was a well thought out article but here on the East Coast, the amount of competition is staggering. I think that the average Seller in our area personally knows or is related to six Realtors. Ugh!!! But it was nice to see you got onto the Dashboard. I'm stiving to do the same some time in the future.
Lisa Hammerstein
www.HammersTeam.com
FSBO = has a fool for a realtor
Thanks Donna!
There are so many things to write about that it's hard chosing just one.
Lisa
Eva,
I understand what you're saying completely. However, last year, the state of Texas passed a law about limited service brokerages and the listing agent MUST answer questions for their seller. Since this has come into play, it's easy to tell the seller that they must contact their agent for any questions they have.
Granted, when I bought my first house, I was dealing directly with the seller and I feel I got a much better deal dealing directly with him rather than giving him the opportunity to bounce scenarios off his agent's head. Taking advantage? Nah, he started it!
I think the stastistics also show that listings with realtors sell 17% more than FSBO.
Eva: You are right about needing to do the work of the other realtor. Ahhhhh....... I shake my head. But sometimes we got to do what we got to do.
Hello Donna its been a while, I thought this was a wonderful post, Would you be ok with the idea of me using some of this info in my presentions
Hi Daniel,
It's a published article so go ahead and use it. Keep in the mind that the actual study was done in the Dallas/Ft Worth area, but the overall logic of the information should be valid just about anywhere. The link for the full article is at the bottom of the blog post, so just print it out. Good luck using it! As I had mentioned, even when I point this stuff out, they still ask for discounts...